Car Workshop Employee Without Licence Crashes Lambo in Bukit Batok

Life is great when you get a new car. It looks good, the interior smells fresh and everything seems a little brighter than usual.

But life is terrible when you damage your new car. Even the slightest of scratches on the fresh coating of paint can put you in a bad mood for a few days.

And how do you think you will feel when your beloved car is totaled due to the irresponsible actions of others?

We would be furious if it happened to us.

The owner of a Lamborghini must be fuming mad after an employee in a car repair shop drove the car without the owner’s permission and crashed it.

To make matters worse, that employee did not have a license.

Here is what happened.

Car Repair Shop Employee Drove Customer’s Lamborghini Without a License and Crashed It

Earlier this week, some Facebook posts emerged on the SGRV page about a Lamborghini which crashed.

Car crashes may not be common in Singapore but this one gained attention because the cause of the crash was an employee of a car repair shop.

The employee had taken the customer’s Lamborghini for a spin without the permission of the owner and crashed the car while doing so.

What makes matters worse was that the employee did not have a driving license, according to the caption of the Facebook post.

No wonder the crash happened.

According to the Facebook post, the car repair shop was located in Bukit Batok at WCEGA Plaza, at Revel Studio located on the third floor.

The video attached to the post shows images of the crashed car, whose hood looked badly damaged.

There was also a short clip showing the white car driving forward and crashing into another stationary vehicle.

The Shop Owner Is Allegedly Not Responding to the Owner After the Accident

To worsen the problem of a damaged car, it appears that insurance cannot be claimed for the damage.

The car owner also does not have any recourse from the owner of the car repair shop.

According to the Facebook post, the owner of the shop is “hiding” and “not willing to compensate” the car owner for the losses. The post also said that the owner was “not responsive and avoiding” the car owner.

This was despite the owner knowing that the employee was “driving people’s car without license”.

At least, the rogue employee in question was detained by the police for committing a “rash act” and driving without a license.