Plot Twist in NUS Molestation Case: Victim Claimed She Didn’t Receive any Apology Letter


Advertisements
 

If you’ve come to our app regularly, you’d know that the NUS student who molested a lady has spoken out, claiming that he was extremely remorseful and had written a letter addressed to the victim.

If you’ve not come to our app daily, then you’d better do so because we’ve NUS graduates here with good GPA, and they take the MRT to work daily.

So, everything is fine and whatnot; everyone’s now waiting for AGC to appeal the sentence, and we might still see Terence Siow in jail.

But there’s now a plot twist.

Two plot twists, in fact.

Victim Claimed She Didn’t Receive Any Letter

The letter was allegedly handwritten by Terence to the victim. It’s unknown when it was written and given to the victim, but it seems like it was written but not given to the victim.

Facebook user Karmen Siew, who’s allegedly the victim (and presumably a real profile since it’s been registered for 12 years), posted this just a few hours ago:

If you can’t read, here’s what she’s written:

This is the first time I have heard of a handwritten apology. I was never given a copy and had no idea it existed prior to Shinmin bringing it up. Is it even acceptable to release such a letter, now that the appeal court will review the case?

Oh. Discounting the fact that the letter might have been freshly written and not written after the offence (which took place last year), my question is…why was it only written now?

The letter itself is rather PR-ish, and it seems like I’m not the only one who thinks so:

Let’s give everyone a benefit of the doubt and blame a corporation instead, because that’s what we do best.

SingPost, get your shit together. Did you lose the letter or not?

Now, remember I mentioned about two plot twists?


Advertisements
 

Tuition Agency Suddenly Spoke Out

Terence, according to a million sources, is a tutor as well.

Which could imply that he might not come from a rich family, but anyways.

It’s revealed earlier that his profile is in ChampionTutor Inc., a local tuition agency with a name that sounds like it’s from the US. The agency is pretty lit, with them even offering online tutors.

But anyways.

The agency posted this a few hours ago:


Advertisements
 

Lest you can’t read:

We are aware of the recent incident involving Terence Siow, a freelance tutor from ChampionTutor. His account has been terminated with immediate effect. ChampionTutor strongly disapproves of any misappropriate conduct by our freelancers and will not hesitate to take the necessary action.

Here’s the thing: there were allegations that Terence worked as a full-time tutor in the agency when he was suspended from NUS, and drew more than $6,000 a month.

However, ChampionTutor has responded to the allegations in the comment section, saying that Terence was never offered a teaching assignment before and had not worked full-time in the agency too.

In other words, #fakenews?


Advertisements
 

Whatever it is, the takeaway is that we shouldn’t believe everything on the Internet, especially so when people are angry.

Just wait for reputable sources like Shi Min Daily News, which was founded since 1967, to come out with—oh, wait.

Just, erm, believe the judge lah and—oh, wait.

I think I’m going to sleep and forget about this.