Last Updated on 2016-05-19 , 1:37 pm
By now, everyone should know about the viral wedding photos—it has even made its way into international news media, and how what happened after that is pretty interesting as well.
Anyway, after the photos were released, the photographer has initially came out and defended himself, claiming that the couple had selectively chosen the 20 worst images out of 900 images to post online, and that he had spent 10 hours on the job. He even posted some images that looked better to prove his case.
Then, the defensive post was quietly deleted, and he posted his apology:
In case this post was deleted as well (for whatever reason), here’s what he had written:
First & foremost, I would like to apologise to this couple for the 20+ bad actual day wedding photos that they have received. My bridal company & I could have done better by QC & removing them first before giving to you. I received $350 for this full day wedding photography & editing assignment, and I should have done better.
My usual practice is to give the bridal company all the actual day photos & in turn, they will pass them to the couples. Lesson learnt, I will instead QC the photos first before giving them to the bridal studio.
I sincerely hope you find the remaining 800+ photos good. I thoroughly enjoyed covering your wedding that day.
Once again, my sincere apologies for the hurts you went through with the terrible photos. Perhaps we could meet up & allow me to buy you coffee & apologise to you in person for the inconvenience caused.
This is a clear difference in his first post, whereby he wrote with English that was extremely difficult to understand (i.e. very broken English).
Okay, now that you know the progress, here’s the lighter side of the story: someone has found the real meaning of the photos.
Apparently, they’re meant for several movie posters. Our favourite is this, because it just has so much feels.
You can view all the posters here!
Over in TikTok, there’s a drama involving property agents that’s caused by us. Here’s what happened:
Read Also:
- A Yishun “Landlord” Who’s Not a Landlord Took $1,000 Deposit & Allegedly Banished a Knife When Prospect Requested Deposit Back
- Taxi Slams into Woman Who Jaywalks While Looking at Her Phone at Orchard Road
- Woman Took an Empty Bowl in a Noodles Stall Without Permission, Leading to a Shouting Match
- 3 Shops In Singapore To Custom-Make Affordable Charm Bracelets & Necklaces
- Soon, Your Bank Accounts Could be Restricted If You’re a Potential Scam Victim
- Man Manages To Forge Over 460 Grab Receipts to Claim Over $16,400 From His Company
Advertisements
