Alright, kids, here’s a lesson on news. Never read the headlines alone and believe it to be true.
Oh yeah, it’s time to de-bias some surveys again.
In the headlines: iPhone loyalty falls to an all-time low
The survey, conducted by BankMyCell, says that iPhone retention is down 15 percent over the last year. That number is from 38,043 people trading in smartphones on their site.
If you read only the headline from BankMyCell, you would get…
“Apple’s Decline in Sales During Q1-Q2 2019 Visible as 15.2% Less Trade-In Savvy iPhones Owners Are Sticking With Apple”
Dayuum, that’s a HUGE drop eh?
Survey data sources are wonky af
But hold on, let’s visit the site and see how they conducted the surveys.
Just scrolling down a little, we can now read that “2019’s trade-in savvy iPhones owners are -15.2% less loyal than CIRP’s 2018 survey”. And further down, we see this graph:
To give you an analogy, that’s like tourists coming in to Singapore every year specifically to eat chicken rice. Every year, they would eat at different stores. From the year 2011 to 2018, they ate chicken rice and gave it a review on Google maps, giving them a range from 4 to 4.5/5 each time.
But in 2019, they ate a store that just somehow sucked a little. Maybe it’s one of those cheaper, average or less popular stalls. Then they put on Google reviews “Chicken rice standards have dropped in Singapore”.
It doesn’t make sense. The people each survey collects data from is different. We can just compare the CIRP data in 2014, which has customer loyalty at about 80%. In BankMyCell’s report, it shows 90%.
Scrolling a little bit more, we see this graph:
In 2018, the number is 70.1%. In 2019, it’s now 72.8%, a 2.7% increase for Apple brand of new devices for iPhone trade-ins.
Hold on, doesn’t this mean that if we use only customer data from BankMyCell, brand loyalty actually increased?
So at this point, I’ve pretty much rendered the rest of the report on BankMyCell useless. A pity, considering that the report looks very professional.
Possible bias? Or just poor statistics?
Is there some possible kind of bias in this reporting?
Well well well it would appear that Apple would be releasing their earnings announcement on 30 July 2019, about 2 weeks after this report.
…And while on first look it might look like some fear-mongering thing to temporarily shoot down Apple stock so that someone can short the stock, on second thought that doesn’t quite make sense. At this point, I’m not able to connect more dots, or at the very least don’t have the information to yet.
I’ll shrug it off as poor statistical skills rather than any bias .¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Enjoyed this article because it’s both informative and entertaining? If so, you should download the Goody Feed app so that you won’t miss out on any articles, as there are app-exclusive contents as well! Also, join our Telegram channel if you use Telegram often!
You won't want to miss these most-read articles:
- SMU & NUS Residences Also Used for Quarantine Proposes; Some Students Allegedly Not Happy With The Move
- Taiwanese With Wuhan Virus Hid Symptoms & Went to Taiwan Nightclub; Fined SGD$13.5K
- Singer Participates In Competition To Pay Mum’s Medical Bills; Finds Out She Passed Away During Her Performance
- MOH Says 4th Wuhan Virus Patient Has Been on Public Transport, VivoCity & USS But Risk of Infection is Low
- Hong Kong Protestors Set Fire On Building Meant for Quarantine Proposes
- S’pore Government Debunks 3 Misinformation About Wuhan Virus Status in S’pore