Well, this sucks. Although I’m not directly affected by this, I think I can understand how the drivers felt when this was announced.
I mean, taxi drivers are always complaining about how difficult it is to make money these days. Every so often, the driver of the taxi I’m in would complain about the industry and the nonsense they have to go through on a regular basis (I’m looking at y’all drunk a**holes who puke all over the taxi).
So, imagine after a hard day’s work, you see this message in your mailbox.
“With effect from 1 Feb, you may visit any of our appointed cleaning kiosks (located at 30 Esso stations) to have your taxi cleaned up. The cleaning fee of $0.40/hr is included in all Taxi Share bookings.”
It’s no wonder some taxi drivers flew into a fit of rage.
So, basically, part-time drivers under SMRT’s Taxi Share scheme would have to pay an additional $0.40 an hour as “cleaning fee”.
SMRT Taxis general manager Shaun Lee said that: “For a nominal sum, taxis will be cleaned for drivers that have made bookings under the Taxi Share scheme. This is part of our overall efforts to provide the next driver with a taxi that is in the best condition to serve our commuters.”
Well yeah, he’s not wrong to say that. However, that does not mean that people have to be happy about it, you know.
“Those who make bookings of more than 10 hours will now have to pay an additional S$4, and at the end of the shift they have to waste time going to the kiosk to have their taxi cleaned.” said a taxi driver who only wanted to be known as Mr Desmond.
So, let’s assume that a taxi is being shared by 3 drivers in one day. Does this mean that the taxi would be cleaned 3 times a day if all 3 drivers decide to send it for cleaning?
Look, I don’t know much about cars, but I think cleaning a vehicle 3 times a day is overkill— unless every driver has a puking passenger or something.
And of course, given that Singapore rains so often, it doesn’t really make sense. Might as well donate $0.40 per hour to the sky, no?
Personally, I think this would make sense only to drivers who are driving for a few hours a day. Heck, if you’re using the vehicle for 24 hours, that would be $9.60 worth of surcharge!
…I’m just hoping that the passengers won’t end up bearing the extra costs in the long run!
Always quarrel with your bae? Then you need to watch this video and learn this trick on how to resolve arguments without any compromise or apology (and also subscribe to Goody Feed YouTube channel):
This article was first published on goodyfeed.com
Read Also
- A New Study Shows S’pore as the Second Least Exciting City in the World. What’s New?
- S’pore Tourism Board Passive Aggressively Hit Back & Reports of S’pore Being Boring #LikeABoss
- Woman Blocked Taxi & Then (Disgustingly) Passively Aggressively Online Shame Taxi Driver
Do you love writing? Do you want a platform to showcase your works? Goody Feed is looking for part-time writers to join the team! Click here to find out more
Featured image: taxisingapore.com
Here’s a simplified summary of the South Korea martial law that even a 5-year-old would understand:
Read Also:
- Salon Allegedly Charged $880 Treatment Package to Elderly Who Has Hearing Difficulties
- Man Replaces M’sia-Registered Car With a S’pore Plate & Drives It Without a Driving Licence
- Confirmed: Allianz Withdraws Its Offer to Buy Income Insurance
- 10th Floor Resident Leaves Baby Stroller On Air Conditioner Compressor
- $400 Worth of Durians Delivered to Customer; Customer Allegedly Takes Durians Without Making Payment
- Woman Borrows Touch ‘N Go Card From S’pore Driver to Cross JB Checkpoint & Didn’t Return Card
Advertisements
