What are some of the negative experiences one could possibly have while staying at a resort? For a start, here’s a few:
- Bad sanitisation
- Infestation of bugs
- Poor service
And what can you do if you’re unsatisfied with your getaway trip?
Some would naturally want to go and speak directly to the front desk. If that didn’t go well, others might choose to write a negative review.
That was exactly what one tourist did. But instead of getting a refund, the tourist was threatened with a lawsuit instead.
Tourist Left Negative Review of Thai resort on Agoda
On 19 Dec last year, one tourist by the name of Khing left a not-so-nice review on Agoda.
Lest you’ve forgotten because you’ve not travelled for 87 years, Agoda is an online travel agency for vacations, hotels, and flights.
After staying at a Thai resort for a night, she rated her stay there a “6 out of 10”. Primarily, she felt that the experience there was not worth the high price.
Khing described the view from the room as “just okay”. On top of that, the tourist mentioned the room did not look as new.
Seems like a case of mismatched expectations vs reality.
Moreover, the tourist continued to recount her unpleasant experience. Khing alleged that she was unable to call the reception from her room. As such, she had to walk down by herself.
Apparently, some staff members who were on night shift were also not helpful.
To be fair, she did say that some were welcoming.
Join our Telegram channel for more entertaining and informative articles at https://t.me/goodyfeedsg or download the Goody Feed app here: https://goodyfeed.com/app/
Resort Threatened Tourist with S$120K Lawsuit
In response to the negative review, the management of the resort has hit back with a lawsuit.
To be specific, the tourist was threatened with a three million baht defamation lawsuit.
That amounts to approximately S$120,000.
A Facebook post was published on 7 Jan by Sittra Biabangkerd, secretary-general of the Lawyers for the People Foundation. Khing was his client.
Apparently, Khing was ordered by the Thai resort to take down the negative review with immediate effect.
Furthermore, the resort also requested that Khing publish an apology in a newspaper for seven consecutive days.
If Khing was not agreeable to the proposed terms and conditions, she will be required to pay approximately S$2,000 per day in compensation on top of the three million baht.
Ouch.
It’s still unknown what would happen next, but suffice to say, we all know how it’ll end.
Read Also:
- Leader of the House Reprimanded PSP’s Leong Mun Wai for Making Unsubstantiated Allegations Against Teachers
- Filmgarde Closing 2 of Its 3 Cinemas Partly Due to COVID-19
- Wuhan Couple Who Lied to MOH Finally Gave Up & Will Start Their Jail Sentence
Featured Image: Facebook (Sittra Biabangkerd)
Here’s a simplified summary of the South Korea martial law that even a 5-year-old would understand:
Read Also:
- Salon Allegedly Charged $880 Treatment Package to Elderly Who Has Hearing Difficulties
- Man Replaces M’sia-Registered Car With a S’pore Plate & Drives It Without a Driving Licence
- Confirmed: Allianz Withdraws Its Offer to Buy Income Insurance
- 10th Floor Resident Leaves Baby Stroller On Air Conditioner Compressor
- $400 Worth of Durians Delivered to Customer; Customer Allegedly Takes Durians Without Making Payment
- Woman Borrows Touch ‘N Go Card From S’pore Driver to Cross JB Checkpoint & Didn’t Return Card
Advertisements
