Catfight, but not cats, just two human beings.
Over what? $15.
Even cats won’t fight over that #justsaying
Fighting Over $15
Two ladies had argued on Monday (28 Nov) in Bugis.
The altercation started when a customer walked into a beauty parlour at The Bencoolen and demanded a S$15 service refund.
When the receptionist objected, all hell broke loose.
The customer decided to brilliantly handle it as a respectful adult; by that, I meant an adult monkey, as she reportedly struck the receptionist, which then led to a physical fight between the two.
But wait, let’s rewind to how this all began.
According to Shin Min Daily News, the customer had gone to the beauty parlour for brow shaping and spot removal.
Soon later, she returned to the salon and told the receptionist that she was unhappy with the results of the service. She then wanted to see the beautician who had worked on her and a complete S$15 refund.
The receptionist, Ms Wang, declined to comply with her request since she wasn’t quite sure what had transpired between the customer and the beautician.
This refusal incited the customer, who shoved and slapped Ms Wang’s neck.
Surprised by the sudden violence, Ms Wang fought back to defend herself. Both parties eventually came to a standstill when the customer called for the police.
Police soon arrived and assisted in diffusing the situation.
Join our Telegram channel for more entertaining and informative articles at https://t.me/goodyfeedsg or download the Goody Feed app here: https://goodyfeed.com/app/
Ms Wang’s Side of the Story
Talking to Shin Min Daily News, Ms Wang recounted that the customer’s trip to the salon barely lasted ten minutes. During payment, the customer didn’t seem to be unhappy either.
So it came as a surprise to her when the customer returned shortly and demanded a refund for the dissatisfied service, which she had refused.
Honestly, she’s right there; why would you complain only after payment has been made?
And if you think about it, Ms Wang was, unfortunately, taking the fall for something she was not even responsible for.
She added that it had only been one month since she started working in Singapore, and did not anticipate something like that happening so soon after arriving.
Looking at it from a larger scale, it’s sad that front-facing workers are the scapegoats for faults that they are not even responsible for sometimes. Hopefully, this will be the last time she faces something like that.
But I’m kidding; she should be facing more of such customers in the future.
Read Also:
- NEA & SPF Fined 25 Motorcyclists for ‘Excessive Noise Emissions’ in Joint Checks Against Errant Motorcycles
- Monkeypox Will Now be Renamed to Mpox
- BKK Cinema Offers Unlimited Popcorn But Has to End Promotion Early
- Lawrence Wong: Temasek Doing Internal Review on Failed FTX Investment
- Anwar Responds After People Spotted Him Wearing S$1.6K LV Shoes
Featured Image: Shin Min Daily News (Facebook)
Here’s a simplified summary of the South Korea martial law that even a 5-year-old would understand:
Read Also:
- Salon Allegedly Charged $880 Treatment Package to Elderly Who Has Hearing Difficulties
- Man Replaces M’sia-Registered Car With a S’pore Plate & Drives It Without a Driving Licence
- Confirmed: Allianz Withdraws Its Offer to Buy Income Insurance
- 10th Floor Resident Leaves Baby Stroller On Air Conditioner Compressor
- $400 Worth of Durians Delivered to Customer; Customer Allegedly Takes Durians Without Making Payment
- Woman Borrows Touch ‘N Go Card From S’pore Driver to Cross JB Checkpoint & Didn’t Return Card
Advertisements
